Naming psychology: Easy-to-pronounce names are rated more trustworthy, safer, and higher quality - even when consumers know nothing else about the product. Cognitive fluency effect: Brain prefers easy processing. Simple names win.
Cognitive Fluency
Easy processing = positive feelings. Names pronounced easily feel familiar, trustworthy, likeable. Names requiring effort feel risky, foreign, suspicious. Subconscious, automatic response.
Studies prove it: Stocks with pronounceable ticker symbols outperform unpronounceable ones short-term. Not logic - psychology. Ease creates preference.
Mere Exposure Effect
Familiarity breeds liking. Repeated exposure increases preference. Even subliminal exposure works. This is why advertising repetition matters. New brand names feel risky.
Overcome with familiarity cues: Names resembling existing words feel less foreign. "Spotify" echoes "spot" - partially familiar. Pure invented words take longer to feel comfortable.
Name-Letter Effect
People prefer letters in their own name. Subconscious self-reference. "Jennifer" likes brands starting with J slightly more than average. Small effect but statistically significant.
Implication: Common letter names appeal broadly. Names with Q, X, Z feel exotic but connect with fewer people. Balance uniqueness with accessibility.
Sound Symbolism Effects
Sounds carry meaning across cultures. Front vowels (ee, ih) = small, fast, light. Back vowels (oo, oh) = large, slow, heavy. Match sound to product perception.
Consonant associations: Voiceless stops (p, t, k) = sharp, quick. Voiced sounds (b, d, g) = soft, slow. Naming isn't arbitrary - sounds prime expectations.
Semantic Priming
Names activate related concepts. "Amazon" primes vastness, rivers, wilderness. "Apple" primes freshness, simplicity, nature. These associations transfer to brand perception.
Careful of negative primes: "Ayds" diet candy failed when AIDS epidemic made name toxic. Names carry baggage from other meanings. Check all associations.
Processing Disfluency Uses
Sometimes hard is good: Luxury brands use disfluency strategically. Difficult French/Italian names signal exclusivity, sophistication. Hard to say = hard to access = premium.
Hermès, Moët, Givenchy work because difficulty signals exclusivity. Mass market brands can't pull this off. Match fluency to positioning.
Memory and Recall
Distinctive names memorable: Unusual names stand out in memory. "Xerox" more memorable than "Copy Services Inc." But too strange = hard to recall. Balance novelty with processability.
Rhyme and rhythm: Names with internal patterns (Kit Kat, TikTok, Coca-Cola) remembered better. Repetition aids encoding. Rhythm creates hooks.
Emotional Resonance
Names trigger emotions: "Joy" feels different than "Efficient." Emotional names create connection. Functional names communicate clearly. Choose based on brand strategy.
Abstract vs concrete: "Amazon" (concrete - river) vs "Accenture" (abstract - invented). Concrete names easier to visualize, remember. Abstract names more flexible, less limiting.
Cultural Considerations
Names carry cultural weight: "Mitsubishi" means "three diamonds" - positive in Japan. Some names meaningless in one culture, loaded in another. Test across target markets.
Linguistic accidents: Chevy Nova supposedly failed in Spanish markets ("no va" = "doesn't go"). Urban legend, but real risks exist. Professional linguistic screening essential for global brands.
First Impressions
Names create instant judgments: Before seeing product, logo, or advertising, name shapes expectation. First touchpoint sets anchor. Subsequent information filtered through initial impression.
Confirmation bias: If name primes "cheap," consumers notice cheap-seeming features. If name primes "premium," same features seem value-added. Names frame perception.
Testing Approaches
Implicit association: Measure reaction times pairing name with positive/negative words. Reveals subconscious associations traditional surveys miss.
A/B testing: Same product, different names. Measure conversion, willingness to pay, trust ratings. Real behavior trumps stated preference.
Trademark Lens checks name availability - psychology research helps select between available options, but first confirm trademark clearance before investing in consumer testing.